Social Anatomy of Action
Toward a Responsibility-Based Conception of AgencyPh.D.
Dissertation: by Preliminary matter Table of
Contents INtroduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Action as a Unit of Conduct.................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Two Main Problems................................................................................................................................................. 5 3. A Preview.................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Is Explanatory Individualism Conceptually Necessary?...................................................... 13 1. Individualism vs. Nonindividualism about Action Explanations................................................................... 14 2. Individualism, Nonindividualism and Evolution............................................................................................... 24 3. Arguments for Explanatory Individualism......................................................................................................... 26 4. Normative Individualism....................................................................................................................................... 39 The Challenge of Hart’s Theory of Action...................................................................................... 50 1. Two Kinds of Action Theories............................................................................................................................ 51 2. H.L.A. Hart’s Theory of Action........................................................................................................................... 53 3. The Fundamental Problem: The Concept of Action is Prior to the Concept of Responsibility................. 57 4. Against Ascriptivism............................................................................................................................................ 60 Practical Responsibility I: Normative Expectations................................................................ 64 1. Normative vs. Descriptive (Predictive) Expectations....................................................................................... 65 2. Normative Expectations........................................................................................................................................ 69 3. Fulfilling Normative Expectations: Actions and Performances....................................................................... 70 4. Moral vs. Practical Normative Expectations...................................................................................................... 73 5. ‘It is (would be) reasonable to expect of a that a j’........................................................................................ 74 Practical Responsibility II: Two Concepts of Reasonableness........................................... 79 1. Two Concepts of Reasonableness...................................................................................................................... 80 2. Reasonableness as an External Standard........................................................................................................... 86 3. Reasonableness, Conflict and Contrary Expectations..................................................................................... 89 Practical Responsibility III: ReasonableA Normative Expectations............................... 94 1. When Are Normative Expectations Prima Facie ReasonableA?...................................................................... 94 2. Defeating Conditions.......................................................................................................................................... 102 3. Some Objections.................................................................................................................................................. 113 4. Defeating Defeating Conditions........................................................................................................................ 118 Actions, Omissions, and Mere Happenings....................................................................................... 128 1. A Preview.............................................................................................................................................................. 128 2. What Has Been Done: Two Senses of the Question..................................................................................... 131 3. What Has Been Done?........................................................................................................................................ 135 4. Actions and Mere Happenings......................................................................................................................... 148 5. Wayward Causal Chains..................................................................................................................................... 158 Selectional Force of Reasons................................................................................................................ 164 1. Davidson’s Challenge......................................................................................................................................... 166 2. Selectional Explanations..................................................................................................................................... 171 3. Reasons as Selectional Criteria.......................................................................................................................... 178 4. Explanatory Nonindividualism Again............................................................................................................... 203 5. Two Further Problems......................................................................................................................................... 214 6. Objections............................................................................................................................................................. 221 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................................... 229 Appendices:.......................................................................................................................................................... 233 Appendix A. The Asymmetry Thesis...................................................................................................... 233 Appendix B. Action As a Performance Intentional Under a Description................... 241 |